What main difference or similarity would you like to discuss? An example of a thesis statement using this idea might be the following: To write such an outline, you would first need a thesis statement. Whatever you choose, make sure that your thesis statement is broad enough to have several sub-points.
These are valid questions. Literary snack food has its place. In the same way, how often you like to push the boundaries of your literary palate with exotic fare is up to you. This kind of problem arises routinely whenever a society fulfills two criteria.
The second is that it has a rich enough literary culture that members of subculture A have next to no reading material in common with subculture B. Mutual incomprehension is the usual result. That is to say, the way to avoid mutual incomprehension is to have a canon.
A canon, in this sense of the word, is a collection of works by dead people that everyone reads, discusses, and thinks about in the course of their schooling.
There are three characteristics of a canon that deserve attention here. Who makes these decisions? In any canon there are certain works that everyone, or nearly everyone, agrees on, certain others that are less unanimously included, and a fringe of works that this or that subculture of fans consider to be canon fodder and everybody else dismisses.
This allows the canon to shape itself, and reshape itself, as an organic expression of the experience of a community. Finally, a canon is always unfair. Factors other than literary merit and relevance have their inevitable roles, too, ranging from ethnic, gender, and class prejudice all the way to temporary vagaries of cultural taste that make the appeal of this or that literary gimmick irresistible for a while, and incomprehensible thereafter.
Now of course the inevitable unfairness of a canon is one of the standard points raised by those who insist that having a canon is a Bad Thing, and that canons of literature should therefore be abolished. Pay attention, though, to what inevitably happens thereafter.
So a canon is always changing, always contested, and always unfair. None of these things keeps it from doing its job, which is that of providing a basis for shared understanding in a society diverse enough to require that. The current bickering between the political correctness of the left and the patriotic correctness of the right is a familiar phenomenon in cultural history.
One of the great advantages of having a canon is that it makes it a lot easier to filter out trash. Even in the most brilliant of literary cultures, a century might see a dozen genuine masterworks and a couple of hundred really good pieces of writing.
Mark Twain once did the world a favor by exhuming one of these last, an otherwise forgotten midth century American novel, The Enemy Conquered; or, Love Triumphant by Samuel Watson Royston.
In most cases, this is exactly what they deserve. No doubt some of my readers will take umbrage at this claim.Compare and contrast the poems “Ozymandias” by Percy Shelley and “Ulysses” by Alfred, Lord leslutinsduphoenix.com are these poems’ views of life.
finishing dissertation sigma 24 mm f 4 art review essay argument essay help debate speech on co education essays life in a concentration camp essay. A summary of “Ulysses” in Alfred Lord Tennyson's Tennyson’s Poetry.
Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of Tennyson’s Poetry and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans.
Compare and contrast the poems “Ozymandias” by Percy Shelley and “Ulysses” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson. What are these poems’ views of life achievements? Directly referenced in Watchmen by the character Ozymandias. Being an extremely powerful and clever man, he’s completely aware of the unfortunate connotations of .
Shelley puts the words of the inscription in effectively ironic contrast with the surroundings. The rulers of the world, "ye Mighty," are told by Ozymandias, "king of kings," to look upon his works and despair of emulating them.